http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/carbon-dioxide-capture-1206.html
A new MIT study shows that, at least for the foreseeable future, proposals to capture carbon from the air are not realistic. Are you agree with this assertion?
Answer this question Add to Reference Share Ask your friend to Answer














Nags
Joshwolf
Robbes
Narsi
Kgurrappa
Farz
Gaya3
Bioreactor
Hadi10
Tskusurkar
Mjantoun
Abinandan
Virafmehta
Greendiamond
Hemamark
Robin
Alchemist
Paragone1
Nsree13
Caseysea
Dipankar123
Zman
Adityachavali
Mickyrox
Mohanalex
Kanishkatks
Cll123
Missjulia
Juhams
Luca1964
Indresh
Sreejithsisupalan
Surendra
Charansathish
Ethannangle
Bhaskarg
Mandersson
Larsyntoo
Larrydhays
I recall not too many years ago the attempt was made by a number of scientists to devise machines to increase the amount of CO2 in the air, because this would increase plant growth and lead to a more lush, prosperous planet with more food for all.
Thankfully for us, all of these attempts to mess with our planet are pathetically tiny and meaningless. In fact the CO2 and temperature levels are self regulating, and move up and down quite beyond our control.
It is up to us to learn to live with the eternal, natural climate swings of nature.
Under an open pounds or a semi continuous culture system, this reality is correct; mainly due to two facts: low CO2(g) diffusion into culture medium and a very high culturing area are required. But with continuous culture systems, required culture area can be reduced at least by 10 times; culture time can be reduced from 3 - 4 weeks to 3 - 4 days and productivity increased 1.5 - 2 times. All these improvements do it viable Carbon Capture.