Welcome to CleanTick - Network with thousands of cleantech researchers and experts - Join CleanTick >>

Devising Cost Effective Drying for Microalgae - CleanTick Challenge


Members who are involved in this challenge
See full profile See full profile See full profile See full profile See full profile See full profile See full profile See full profile See full profile See full profile See full profile See full profile See full profile

Login to CleanTick Challenge - Join the Rest of the World in Solving the Cleantech Challenges

Overall Comments (7)

  • What are all the possible ways to dry microalgae? All right, I am not looking for an exhaustive list, but let's say the list of the most likely methods?

    in Algae Fuels

    • View all 7 comments
    • Alchemist 7 months ago

      Sorry no more data – it was a rather short lived trial – I was borrowing it !! I was very lucky to have one (AlgaeVenture equipment) in my town !!and very thankful of the owners of the unit !! very cool – if I were to dry sensitive micro algae material – it would be the most cost effective way – not sure how economical it would be for fuel – the equipment is really expensive. It is always the way (my opinion) – capital expensive and low cost process and small foot print or large foot print and low cost processing or lower cost capital and expensive processing. No easy answer – all relates to the algae and what you want to do with it.

    Write a comment / Share a link
    Avatar Image
      or Cancel
  • PARC 's Spiral Technology - A liter of algae-infused water can be bright green, but it might only contain one to three grams of usable algae. To separate algae now, companies employ drying (which can gobble up 2 percent to 10 percent of the cost of producing fuel) centrifuges (4 percent to 14 percent) or filtration membranes (which get fouled).

    http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/parcs-solution-for-algae-fuel-going-down-the-drain/

    in Algae Fuels

    • View all 19 comments
    • Kyzyl 8 months ago

      @Glenmills, Let me ask you. Your bead/ball mill has some difference, I mean breakthrough in milling, which I didn't see in pdf description and at your company's website. Or it still uses common approach when only up to 20% of feeding energy spends to milling processing and all other spends on overcoming of resistance of environment?

    Write a comment / Share a link
    Avatar Image
      or Cancel
  • Compact Membrane Systems has engaged in research into a variety of applications for our highly fluorinated polymer gas separation membranes and gas-liquid membrane contactors. - http://www.compactmembrane.com/Research.html

    in Algae Fuels

    Write a comment / Share a link
    Avatar Image
      or Cancel
  • NASA's OMEGA project is trialing forward osmosis as a low cost method of de-watering algae: "the salt gradient can be used for forward osmosis, which not only cleans the wastewater released into the sea, it also concentrates the algae for harvesting."

    http://www.algaeindustrymagazine.com/nasas-omega-scientist-dr-jonathan-trent/

    in Algae Fuels

    • View all 16 comments
    • Annasternfeldt 9 months ago

      Just like to thank you guys for an interesting discussion where I learned a lot. And I am pleased to see such a respectful tone!

    Write a comment / Share a link
    Avatar Image
      or Cancel
  • Estimates we did at Oilgae suggest that the drying cost using conventional methods will be between $200-$500 per ton of dry biomass, which is humungous, especially so when the cost of biomass production has to be less than $300 per dry ton to be economically competitive with fossil fuels.


    This cost can be eliminated by extracting oil directly from the wet biomass bypassing the drying step. Direct-extraction or wet-extraction is basically a water-tolerant downstream process which involves separating oil from the wet algae paste and then subjecting it to transesterfication to produce biodiesel.


    Some research institutes that have been working on wet extraction:

    University of Michigan

    Research studies from the University of Michigan reveal that the direct extraction method will be a feasible option to produce oil directly from wet algal biomass. They have worked on the marine water algae Chlorella vulgaris.


    Basically, their process involves two steps:


    •The wet algal biomass is reacted with subcritical water to hydrolyze intracellular lipids, conglomerate cells into an easily filterable solid that retained the lipids and produced a sterile, nutrient-rich aqueous phase.


    •The wet, fatty acid-rich solids are then subjected to supercritical transesterification with ethanol to produce fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs).


    Ames Labs / Catalin


    •Ames Labs and Catalin – a nano- technology based company which specialize on biofuels have devised a technology that uses sponge-like nanoparticles to extract oil from the algae.


    •The process doesn't harm the algae like other methods being developed, which helps reduce both production costs and the production cycle.


    •Once the algal oil is extracted, a separate and proven solid catalyst from Catilin will be used to produce ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) and EN certified biodiesel.

    Company : Oilgae

    in Algae Fuels

    • View all 7 comments
    • Alchemist 9 months ago

      Greetings Relating to the wet extraction – there are a couple companies not only trialling that process but have mastered it!!! http://solrayenergy.com/ would be from my opinion that most advanced – I have actually seen the product and – it is great !!

    Write a comment / Share a link
    Avatar Image
      or Cancel
  • Algae Fuel Companies that have been working on wet extraction: - Origin Oil

    Origin Oil developed a wet extraction process termed Quantum Fracturing™ which combines with electromagnetism and pH modification to break down cell walls that combines ultrasound and electromagnetic pulse induction to break the algae cell walls. Carbon-dioxide is added to the algae solution, which lowers the pH and separates the biomass from water.

    Origin Oil claims that their process can reduce energy use by about 90% for total energy cost as little as $200 per metric ton of algae oil at full scale production.

    AlgaeLink uses the same wet-extraction technology and claim that the total power consumption used in a 45m³ per hour oil extraction process is just 26 kW to turn 50% of the algae paste into oil

    Aurora Algae also seems to be using the wet extraction technique for fuel production.

    Company : Oilgae

    in Algae Fuels

    • View all 4 comments
    • Narsi 9 months ago

      Quantum fracturing sounds so complicated; in my opinion, it is simple ideas that will work

    Write a comment / Share a link
    Avatar Image
      or Cancel
  • Once more. As I remember, I tried to propose how to eliminate the bottleneck in the algae's separation and water. I've checked data from the article, to which I referred. It's working. On NSE machine I received around 1kWh/cbm of expenses. However for continuation is necessary to obtain additional information of algae's density in water's mixture and waters base's conductivity. Is it possible? These data allow to make the next step - electrochemical drying of biomass. The question has appeared in this connection: the level of humidity, which must be reached and time of drying.

    in Algae Fuels

    • View all 8 comments
    • Kyzyl 10 months ago

      Dear Narasimhan, I unsuccessfully tried to send my notes yesterday and this day. The button of my inbox is out of work. So I'm using comments. I don't know how useful they will, but this technology is really a breakthrough. Algae and water create a colloidal system. The evidence of this assertion is wetting of algae. The buoyancy of algae shows that its density smaller than 1000 kg/cbm. Thus the final DAF can be used for a separation. The first step should be destroying of colloidal system because much energy during DAF will spent on this process without the first processing. The application of electric field allows combining processes of flotation and demolishing relations (electric based) in colloidal systems. It is not paid attention on the first stage of colloidal systems treatment in conventional electric (electrochemical) flotators. That’s why their work is reminding “shooting the sparrows from cannon” (the U.S. definition - overkill) and that’s why electric flotators are characterised by comparatively high energy consumption. The next parameters must be taken into attention for separation by floatation: quantity of the floating mass; rate of saturation of colloidal system; rate of its motion through flotator and regime of it; the optimal size and shape of bubbles. The latter are in function’s connection. All other regimes are derivative functions. The minimum difference of potential for water decomposition is 1.85V; however the dissolved gases emission begins earlier and depends on electrodes material. For example In case of only hydrogen-oxygen motive force and parallel electrodes’ connection; volume velocity 10cbm/h (2.78 L/s) and 3V application; the electric current passes through the electrode gaps is: In=U/Rn =3/0.71= 4.22 A. The total current (I) is: I = ΣIn =211 A and power (P) is: P =U•I =633 W. Time of treatment 600s and treated volume is ~1.7 cbm. Energy consumption of is ~0.1kWh or specific energy consumption is ~0.06 kWh/cbm. According to the Faraday’s law it means that during stated treatment time should be emitted ~ 1.06 g of hydrogen and ~ 8.46 g of oxygen that occupy volume 0.012 m3 and 0.006 m3 respectively. It means saturation of the treated volume of the hydrogen concentration: 0.012/0.17 = 0.07 m3/m3 and saturation of the treated volume of the oxygen concentration: 0.006/0.17 =0.035 m3/m3; when the dissolution of hydrogen and oxygen in normal condition is: 0.018 and 0.027 m3/m3 respectively. Also it means the concentration 50 mg oxygen per litre and 1060 mg hydrogen per litre, when maximum dissolving of oxygen in water in normal condition is 8 mg per litre and dissolving of hydrogen is 1.71 mg per litre respectively. In case of optimal bubble’s diameter 50 microns the quantity of them will be 4·10^10 bubbles. This quantity will be enough to rise 145 kg of a substance with density ~860kg/cbm dispersed in water. However the main part of energy consumption belongs to the pumps. During stated example’s testing the pump’s consuming was 2.5 kWh.

    Write a comment / Share a link
    Avatar Image
      or Cancel

20 Things You Can Do @ CleanTick

20 Things @ CleanTick